WebJul 28, 2011 · Whereas reliance had been placed on R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC [2002] EWHC 2282 (Admin), what was striking about that case was the contrast between it and this one. … WebAug 15, 2024 · 40. Mr McKendrick QC has reminded the court of the generous ambit of Article 5.4 which entitles a person to speedy consideration by a court and in particular has referred to the case of Waite v the United Kingdom ECHR 2002. Article 5.4 is first and foremost a guarantee of a fair procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of detention.
R. v. Marshall; R. v. Bernard - Indigenous Jurisprudence Autochtone
WebNov 6, 2002 · 2002-11-07T00:00:00+00:00. No comments. Bernard v Enfield LBC. Mr and Mrs Bernard lived with their six children. ... The council's failure to act was coupled with a … WebMar 11, 2024 · Counsel also relied on the decisions of Sullivan J in R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC [2002] EWHC 2282 (Admin), [2003] HRLR 111, para 45, Stanley Burnton J in R (KB) v South London and South and West Region Mental Health Review Tribunal [2003] EWHC 193 (Admin), [2004] QB 936, paras 47 and 53 and the Court of Appeal in Anufrijeva v … asuntohakemus tampere
Enfield London Borough Council elections - Wikipedia
WebMR R CLAYTON QC AND MISS J RICHARDS (instructed by Tyrer Roxburgh) appeared on behalf of the CLAIMANT MR H HARROP-GRIFFITHS (instructed by London Borough of … WebPrivy Council: St Helena Supreme Court: United Arab Emirates: Courts: Abu Dhabi Global Market judgments (Court of Appeal) Abu Dhabi Global Market judgments (Court of First Instance) Qatar: Courts: Qatar International Court: Cayman Islands: Courts: Grand Court of the Cayman Islands Financial Services Division: WebJun 3, 2024 · Short term interim solutions had been proposed by the council but turned down (understandably) by Mr I. It was hard to see what else the council could have done … asunto oy wittenberginkatu 32